<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian TSB backs NTSB on Caravan Icing Restriction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lahso.megginson.com/2006/01/31/canadian-tsb-backs-ntsb-on-caravan-icing-restriction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lahso.megginson.com/2006/01/31/canadian-tsb-backs-ntsb-on-caravan-icing-restriction/</link>
	<description>Flying a small plane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:36:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://lahso.megginson.com/2006/01/31/canadian-tsb-backs-ntsb-on-caravan-icing-restriction/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/archives/2006/01/31/canadian-tsb-backs-ntsb-on-caravan-icing-restriction/#comment-291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to reiterating what the NTSB said in their recommendations, the TSB also specified required pilot actions. Namely, exit icing conditions when they are encountered. I like the idea of required pilot actions. If you wait until you can no longer maintain 120 KIAS in a Caravan in icing conditions, you&#039;re probably already in trouble.

As I&#039;ve said before, I&#039;ll be interested to see how Transport Canada, the FAA, and Cessna respond.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to reiterating what the NTSB said in their recommendations, the TSB also specified required pilot actions. Namely, exit icing conditions when they are encountered. I like the idea of required pilot actions. If you wait until you can no longer maintain 120 KIAS in a Caravan in icing conditions, you&#8217;re probably already in trouble.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;ll be interested to see how Transport Canada, the FAA, and Cessna respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

