Comments on: Icing: Altitude Strategy https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/04/28/icing-altitude-strategy/ Flying a small plane. Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:02:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Adam https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/04/28/icing-altitude-strategy/#comment-101 Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:02:29 +0000 /?p=65#comment-101 Yea, I agree with the descent at the end. But, I can also see Chris’ point.

]]>
By: david https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/04/28/icing-altitude-strategy/#comment-100 Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:42:48 +0000 /?p=65#comment-100 What I left out is that I stop climbing immediately if I hit an icing layer — fly at the highest altitude possible only if you do not hit ice on the way up. You have a good point about the descent at the end.

]]>
By: Chris https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/04/28/icing-altitude-strategy/#comment-99 Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:29:45 +0000 /?p=65#comment-99 I don’t really agree because this avoids the question of how you get up there in the first place. If the cloud layer is thick, you really don’t want to have to climb through thousands of feet of possible icing to get up there. Second point is, assuming that you do climb and you pick up ice at e.g. 5000 and the temperature is well below zero at 9000, it will take a while for the ice to dissappear by sublimation. In addition, you’ll be nicely cold when you eventually have to descend, so you might pick up ice even more easily. Also, since icing varies locally, you guarentees you that you won’t be picking up ice all the way down from 9000 to say 5000 at your destination?

]]>