Comments on: A low approach, and the lights https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/ Flying a small plane. Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:36:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Frank https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-242 Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:36:20 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-242 Yup, the Aztec is oop and aboot. The deicing stuff ended up being useful/needed during only short spurts the last few weeks. Its most tangible effect is relative comfort of having it available – not having to chew one’s fingers to the bone watching for minute ice buildup.

]]>
By: david https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-241 Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:21:04 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-241 The patient’s backup plan was to reschedule the appointment. Originally, I was down for backup in the morning and primary pilot in the afternoon, but nobody else stepped forward, so I agreed to fly both.

I hope that your twin is back in the air, Frank — you must really appreciate the deicing system this time of year.

]]>
By: Frank https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-240 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:44:57 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-240 You kook, I’m surprised you went on the flight in that weather. What were your backup plans?

]]>
By: david https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-239 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:31:05 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-239 It was an unusual situation — that ferocious low-level jet from the south was pulling in extremely warm air, producing record surface temperatures for late November (you must have had them in Rochester as well). The freezing level was well above 10,000 feet, while MEAs for my route were down around 4,000.

]]>
By: Paul Tomblin https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-238 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:21:27 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-238 Since I’m constantly struggling with the question of when it’s safe to go into clouds in the winter, I’m curious as to the temperature on this flight, and how you decided that the icing potential was low enough to make the flight.

]]>
By: Land and Hold Short » Canada/US descent below minima https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-237 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:02:37 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-237 […] I was discussing this approach with some U.S. pilots before I revised the numbers up — at the time, I remembered not seeing the runway until below 100 feet, though now I’m fairly certain I saw it at 130 feet. […]

]]>
By: Land and Hold Short » Ground support https://lahso.megginson.com/2005/11/29/a-low-approach-and-the-lights/#comment-236 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:46:19 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/?p=115#comment-236 […] Today, I had a chance to see what it was like having high-quality ground support during a volunteer Hope Air flight. I’ve already written about one part of my flight out to North Bay to pick up the patient and escort. By the time I got them back here to Ottawa for their early-afternoon appointment, I had already spent 4:30 in the air battling IMC, turbulence, heavy rain, and an 80-knot low-level jet from the south/southwest, all hand-flown (I don’t have an autopilot). When I started slurring words talking to the London FIC during the layover here in Ottawa, I realized that I was unsafe and grounded myself from the return trip (the rain and lowering freezing level at North Bay was also setting off alarms) — but now what? I had on my hands a father, son, and case worker who were planning to be home in North Bay for dinner. I thought about putting them on the bus (a long ride home), but then I decided to call Hope Air on the off chance that they could help. […]

]]>