https://lahso.megginson.com/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/ Flying a small plane. Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:46:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ https://lahso.megginson.com/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/#comment-294 Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:46:32 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/archives/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/#comment-294 […] Nav Canada has decided to go ahead and charge small aircraft a daily fee of $10.00, starting in March 2008, for using any of Canada’s seven busiest airports (and the Vancouver harbour water aerodrome) — that’s on top of any landing fees, etc. charged by the airport authorities. Here’s their announcement. Here’s my response from last February, which still represents my opinion about the charges. […]

]]> https://lahso.megginson.com/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/#comment-293 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:18:53 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/archives/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/#comment-293 Nicely stated David.
I’m of the opinion Nav Canada’s “consultation process” is a bit of a farce.
I am appreciative of the position COPA is taking, contrary to the cheap shot taken by the previous poster “Frank”.
Roberto!

]]> https://lahso.megginson.com/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/#comment-292 Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:43:00 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/archives/2006/02/06/response-to-nav-canada-notice-of-new-and-revised-service-charges/#comment-292 Well put, David. Those are all reasonable observations, more so than COPA’s somewhat hysterical response.

]]>